What Harry Potter book was the best?

Warner Bros. records.

My friend says that the first Harry Potter book is better. I say has relics of the death. What is?
-ValentinesAllOver, via the Inbox

For the record, it seems the world agrees with any of you. Yes, Harry Potter and the sorcerer's stone introduced us to the Diagon Alley and the rest, and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows all included as prettily as a Veela derriere. (The delivery of the final film of the arches of the history of Potter on July 15 and we're livestreaming premiere July 11).

But it seems that two other books have won the heart of Dragon the most:

RELATED: Quoth Rowling, "pottermore"!

I am talking about books three and four, Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban and Harry Potter and the Goblet of fire. Two of these novels are ranked a total of five-star Amazon.com, while the rest are about 4.5 stars. Of course, Amazon ratings do not reflect critical views, but nobody cares what critics that, anyway.

As for the B! TCH, I agree with the masses of readers on Amazon. The Potter books are at their best when they focus on people, their strengths and, more important still, weaknesses of fear - rather than magical as Horcruxes or magical stones McGuffins.

The revelations about the Marauders (of prisoners) and the fate of Cedric Diggory (in Goblet), reproduce those strengths in the broadest sense.

If you disagree with me, it is, of course, wrong.

Still, don't hesitate to vote in favour of his own novel of favorite Potter in the survey below and listen to our heated debate in the most recent podcast!

Photos: If someone has the nose Voldemort, please return

FREE WEEKLY PODCAST! Subscribe in iTunes

View the original article here